Legal Opinion

Hackley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 1985No. Docket 80298PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal involves a cross-claim brought by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company against Auto-Owners Insurance Company and Auto-Owners’ cross-claim against State Farm for the payment of no-fault insurance benefits to Michael Hackley (plaintiff) for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The circuit court entered an order August 24, 1984, granting summary judgment to State Farm and requiring Auto-Owners to reimburse State Farm for benefits already paid to plaintiff and ordering Auto-Owners to continue the payment of benefits to plaintiff. Auto-Owners appeals as of right.

The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Nickerson v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Royal Globe Insurance v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Kalin v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Ottenwess v. Hawkeye Security InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Lankford v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Rohlman v. Hawkeye Security InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Wills v. State Farm Ins. Cos.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Yates v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API