Legal Opinion

Yates v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1987No. Docket 88752PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff filed this action against defendant, plaintiffs no-fault automobile insurance carrier, after defendant denied no-fault benefits to plaintiff following an accident on plaintiffs farm. The trial court granted summary disposition in favor of defendant for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. MCR 2.116(C)(8). Plaintiff now appeals and we reverse.

Plaintiffs son, Thomas Yates, was chopping wood on the family farm and loading it into a pickup truck, which was registered in his parents’ names. Plaintiff joined Tom later in the morning, arriving at the scene by way of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Hackley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Wagner v. Michigan Mutual Liability InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. AMY v. MIC General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Musall v. GolcheffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Gentry v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Cobb v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Cobb v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API