Royal Globe Insurance v. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ryan, J,
The broad and ultimate issue in this case is concerned with which of two insurance companies is responsible to pay no-fault benefits for injuries suffered by an insured’s spouse who was injured in a single motor vehicle accident. That question is answered in turn by our determination whether, under the no-fault insurance act 1 and upon the facts of this case, the injured party was or was not an "occupant” of a motor vehicle at the time she was injured.
We hold that she was not an occupant and reverse the decision below.
The following facts, as recounted in the opinion of the Court of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Nickerson v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Ali Bazzi v. Sentinel Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Auto Club Ins. Ass'n v. DeLaGarzaMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. HarveyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Rednour v. Hastings Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.