Legal Opinion
Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided November 7, 1994No. Docket 167399PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND
Before: Wahls, P.J., and Reilly and Jansen, JJ. Reilly, J.
This matter is before this Court upon remand from the Michigan Supreme Court. Defendant Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company initially appealed from an order of the circuit court granting summary disposition in favor of plaintiff pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10). This Court affirmed the court’s order by a two-to-one decision in Rohlman v Hawkeye-Security Ins Co, 190 Mich App 540; 476 NW2d 461 (1991) (Judge Reilly dissenting). The Supreme Court reversed this Court’s decision and remanded the case to resolve additional issues not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nickerson v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Hackley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lankford v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rasmussen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Berry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. HarveyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Rednour v. Hastings Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Lambert v. Coregis Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.