Nickerson v. Citizens Mutual Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The primary question in this appeal, a matter of first impression before this Court, involves interpretation of what appears to be a common automobile insurance policy clause extending coverage for purposes of protection against damages caused by an uninsured motorist to any "assured” who was "occupying the insured automobile”, the term "occupying” being defined in the policy as "in or upon or entering into or alighting from”.
We hold that plaintiff in the instant case was covered under the language above due to (1) his immediate prior "occupying” of the insured vehicle, and (2) his suffering…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Madden v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
- Wolf v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PennsylvaniaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
- Collins v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Wertman v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Eynon v. Continental Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. GavinMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Tata v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.