Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1930No. Docket No. L.A. 12442PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review the findings and the recommendation of the Board of Governors of The State Bar of California that the petitioner be disbarred from the practice of the law in all the courts of this state.

The decision of the board and of the local committee is claimed to be erroneous on the ground that the State Bar Act (Stats. 1927, p. 38) violates section 13, article I, of the California state Constitution in that the proceedings provided by it do not constitute due process of law and that the act violates certain sections of the United States Constitution or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. In Re ShattuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Matter of DanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. In Re VaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. In Re CateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Black v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Fish v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. In Re BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API