Legal Opinion

In Re Burns

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1935No. 6180PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

A petition was filed with the State Bar Commission seeking the disbarment of Otto D. Burns on three counts: One of which, the “Scott matter,” will not be considered because the commission found no impropriety therein; the other two involve the following situations:

Burns had been employed by one Wolff to secure a settlement for a claim for damages for alleged malpractice against a Dr. Carssow, concededly on an initial agreement for a fee of ten per cent. After lengthy negotiations a settlement was finally secured, whereupon Burns retained $1,000 in cash more than the ten per cent, on his…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. In Re DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  3. French v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. In Re EdwardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Wernimont v. State ex rel. Little Rock Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Disbarment ProceedingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. In Re TraskHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Williford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Matter of LutzIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re BowenIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API