Legal Opinion

Gustafson v. Byers

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1930No. Docket No. 57PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OWEN, J., pro tem.

On the thirteenth day of May, 1926, the defendant, as sheriff of San Diego County, attached a Buick automobile as the property of one Lillian L. Elphick. On the fifteenth day of May, 1926, the plaintiff herein filed with the defendant a third party claim, alleging his ownership of the attached property. On the 2'6th of the month judgment was entered against Lillian L. Elphick, and an execution on the judgment was duly issued on the 29th of said month. Pursuant to the execution, and after due and legal notice, the sheriff sold the said automobile on the eighth day of June,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Thom v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Morneault v. National Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. Kern Valley Bank v. KoehnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Wade v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Lint v. ChisholmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Flennaugh v. HeinrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. In Re LandryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API