Kern Valley Bank v. Koehn
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Kern County refusing to dissolve an attachment. J. W. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. W. P. Laird, Rowen Irwin, and E. L. Foster, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
Appeal from an order refusing to dissolve an attachment.
Plaintiff sued defendant on a promissory note and attached certain property belonging to defendant. The affidavit for the attachment contained the usual clause negativing the holding of any property by mortgage lien or pledge to secure the payment of the note.
Defendant moved the court to dissolve the attachment on the ground that the promissory note sued on was secured by a lien and pledge of personal property made by defendant to plaintiff, and that such property was so held by plaintiff at the time such attachment was issued. In…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Caminetti v. State Mutual Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- In Re JostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Gustafson v. ByersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Jost v. United States Department of LaborCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953