Estate of Nunes
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
The basic problem presented on this appeal is whether the seventh paragraph of the will of Joseph F. Nunes so clearly describes the respondent as recipient of the bequest therein provided.as to preclude the introduction of extrinsic evidence that would tend to show that, in fact, the decedent intended to leave the bequest to appellant. The trial court determined, as a matter of law, that respondent was the only person precisely described in the will, excluded the proffered extrinsic evidence to show a contrary intent, and instructed the jury to bring in a verdict for respondent. From the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Patch v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- In Re Estate of DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Estate of DominiciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Kurkjian v. OhannesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Taylor v. McCowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Estate of CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- American Cancer Society v. Church Divinity SchoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Bank of California v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Estate of CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Estate of BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.