Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Donnellan
California Supreme Court
Decided September 27, 1912No. S.F. No. 6079PublishedCited by 60 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Wm. S. McKnight, for Mary Riley et al., Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Catherine Donnellan died testate in the city and county of San Francisco, and her will was there probated. The tenth clause of her will is as follows:
“The one-fourth of the rest and residue of my property I will devise and bequeath to my niece Mary, a resident of New York, said Mary being the daughter of my deceased sister Mary, the name of my niece Mary I do not know as I understand she is now married, nor am I sure of niece Mary’s maiden name, as her mother, my sister Mary, was twice married, but I believe my niece’s maiden name was Mary Donóhoe.”
Upon petition for distribution Annie…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of DominiciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Taylor v. McCowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- McKeough's Est. v. McKeoughSupreme Court of Vermont · 1896
- In re Welch's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1905
3Cited by60 opinions
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Paley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- O'Connor v. West Sacramento Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.