Legal Opinion

Estate of Carroll

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1956No. Civ. No. 16763PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

138 Cal.App.2d 363 (1956)

Estate of ELIZABETH TATE CARROLL, Deceased. W. A. ROBISON, as Public Administrator etc., et al., Respondents,

v.

CHARLES H. TATE et al., Appellants.

Civ. No. 16763.

California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. One.

Jan. 10, 1956.

Dinkelspiel & Dinkelspiel, Richard C. Dinkelspiel and Norman Coliver for Appellants.

John B. Ehlen for Respondents.

BRAY, J.

Appellants appeal from the decree confirming report of referee and determining interests in an estate.

Questions Presented

Was respondent George E. Deputy [fn. *] disinherited by his aunt's will so as to prevent the application…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Larrabee v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. In Re the Estate of KurtzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Hunsinger v. LandgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Estate of PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Torregano v. TorreganoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. MacFarlane v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Dye v. BattlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Hart v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Harding v. KeppnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API