Legal Opinion

Estate of Dominici

California Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1907No. Sac. No. 1442PublishedCited by 41 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Joseph Dominici died testate. Upon distribution question arose as to the interpretation of the provisions of his will and of a codicil thereto, and from the decree ■as ordered Marie Kohler appeals. The only matter here in ■controversy is a dispute over the conflicting claims of Marie Kohler and of Christiane Arndt.

The conflict arises under the following state of facts: By his will Dominici provided as follows: “Lastly, I give, bequeath and devise all the rest, residue and remainder of my property, real and personal, of whatsoever kind or character, ■or "wheresoever situated, share and share…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. In Re the Estate of NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Doherty v. O'CallaghanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. In re Estate of LaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. In re Estate of WaxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Salmonski v. BardzinskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. In Re Estate of DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API