Kurkjian v. Ohanneson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
This is an appeal from an order in proceedings to determine heirship in the estate of Ruby Sargavak, deceased, initiated by nephews and nieces, the only heirs of Mrs. Sargavak. J. G. Ohanneson and Samuel G. Mahdesian, the legatees in the codicil later mentioned, were declared by the order to be entitled to the entire estate under the codicil.
It appears that in 1945 Mrs. Sargavak made a witnessed will in which she named her heirs as legatees and Mahdesian as executor. That will was admitted to probate and a contest filed on the ground of mental incapacity. Following a verdict for contestants…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Salmonski v. BardzinskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Beck v. West Coast Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Estate of SargavakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Mallarino v. HammersmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- County of San Diego v. MilotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Estate of CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.