James E. Martin v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc. v. Schiavo Brothers, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
At the trial of this diversity action for negligent personal injury the district court granted the defendant’s motion under Rule 50, 28 U.S.C.A., for a directed verdict at the end of plaintiff’s case. 1 From the resulting judgment for the defendant the plaintiff has appealed. Also in question is the action of the district judge in denying a new trial sought under Rule 60 on the ground of newly discovered evidence.
Appellant’s evidence, ' principally his own testimony, showed that he suffered a serious second-degree acid burn on his left foot when some of the contents of a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Loch v. ConfairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Muslera v. Patton Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Sierocinski v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Roche v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Semensky v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Metal Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Lentino v. Fringe Employee Plans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Lyncott Corp. v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- McMeekin v. Gimbel Brothers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Fechter v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.