Legal Opinion

Semensky v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 1944No. Appeal, 191PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

In this action of trespass, the plaintiff secured a verdict for personal injuries sustained by him in an accident which occurred while moving a railroad car on the premises of his employer. The verdict requires that the evidence, and all the inferences that may be drawn from it, be considered in the light most favorable to him on his appeal from an order entering judgment n. o. v. for defendant.

Plaintiff was employed by Max Bailis & Sons, scrap metal dealers with a yard at Delaware Avenue and Reed Street in Philadelphia, as a laborer, driving a delivery [nick ¡and loading…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. PenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Zahniser v. Pennsylvania Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Phil. & Read. R. v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Rose v. Adelphia HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Desibia v. Monongahela Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Patton v. Baltimore & O. R. Co. (Duquesne Slag Products Co., Third Party Defendant) (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  2. Ambrose v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Maternia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. James E. Martin v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc. v. Schiavo Brothers, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  5. Leggieri v. Philadelphia Coca Cola Bottling Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API