Loch v. Confair
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Chief Justice Hoeace Stern,
The wife plaintiff having been injured by the bursting of a bottle of ginger ale, she and her husband brought suit in assumpsit to recover damages against Confair’s Beverage Company, which had bottled the ale. In that action this court affirmed the judgment of the court below sustaining defendant’s preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer and dismissing the complaint: Loch v. Confair, 361 Pa. 158, 63 A. 2d 24. Plaintiffs then brought the present action in trespass against the Beverage Company and The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. HickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Rozumailski v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Loch Et Ux. v. Confair Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Dellacasse v. Floyd Exrs.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Dillon v. William S. Scull Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Toogood v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- MacDougall v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.