Lentino v. Fringe Employee Plans, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from the grant of a Rule 50(a) motion for a directed verdict.1 Appellants, plaintiffs below, contend that the directed verdict was improper because it was granted prior to the close of plaintiffs’ evidence. We conclude that appellants were not prejudiced by the exclusion of the final item in their case and affirm the order of the district court.
Plaintiffs are the current trustees of the Employee Severance Pay Plan of Teamsters Local 158 (the Plan), a plan designed to *477provide benefits to employees upon the termination of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Rogin v. Bensalem TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Metal Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.