Legal Opinion

Kaiser v. Butchart

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 20, 1936No. Nos. 30,782, 30,783PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

The appellants, copartners, appeal from an order in each of the two cases denying their motion to set aside the service of summons upon them on the ground that the pretended service did not give the court jurisdiction of appellants. It appears that appellants are nonresident copartners and hold license from this state to do business herein as brokers, maintaining offices for that purpose in St. Paul, Minneapolis, and Duluth. When the transactions involved in the complaint took place appellants held a license as brokers under the provisions of L. 1925, c. 192, as amended (1…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chubbuck v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. State v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Davidson v. Henry L. Doherty & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Allen v. CoatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Zochrison v. Redemption Gold Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Vogel v. Chase Securities Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1936
  4. Boyum v. Massachusetts Investors TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Thomes v. AtkinsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API