Legal Opinion
Thomes v. Atkins
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 9, 1943No. Civ. 436PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
This action is brought to recover the value of plaintiffs’ securities, consisting mainly of stocks registered in their names, on the theory that the defendants converted them to their own use because they were not good-faith purchasers for value. Defendants are a New York partnership operating as Slaughter & Russell and A. O. Slaughter & Company, and were licensed to carry on a brokerage business pursuant to the Minnesota Securities Act, Chapter 80, Minnesota Statutes for 1941. An office was maintained in Minneapolis during the period in question, when securities .and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Acklen's v. HickmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Manning v. School District No. 6Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- King Cattle Co. v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. WickhamDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1935
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. American Strawboard Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1901
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- J. C. Penney Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Walker v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969