Legal Opinion

State v. Swenson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 1927No. 26,150PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Defendant was convicted of violating the so-called blue sky law (L. 1925, p. 197, c. 192), by selling an interest in an unregistered “profit sharing or participating agreement or scheme,” which interest was evidenced by the following instrument:

“Promoter Inventor
“Sigurd M. Swenson Arthur H. Wright
“Wright Rotary-Reciprocating-Combustion Motor Company
“Dyckman Hotel
“Minneapolis
“Sleepy Eye, Minn.
“June 29, 1926.
“It is Hereby Mutually Agreed by and between Sigurd M. Swenson, hereinafter referred to as the party of the first part, and Thomas S. Merkel, of Sleepy Eye, Minnesota, hereinafter…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Central Lumber Co. v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. State v. Gopher Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. People v. PaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Kerst v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Holden v. PIONEER BROADCASTING CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Crude Oil Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  5. Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API