Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 1, 1960No. 37,859, 37,860, 37,861PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dell, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs brought three actions to recover money paid for certain oil and gas leases allegedly sold in violation of the Minnesota Securities Act. The actions were consolidated for trial and also on this appeal. Plaintiffs appeal from summary judgments entered in favor of defendants.
The plaintiffs Merle O. and Margaret M. Anderson allege in their complaint (case No. 518224, hereinafter referred to as the Anderson case) that between April 15 and May 22, 1955, the defendants, Mikel Drilling Company and Oscar E. Chambers, its president, sold and conveyed to them an undivided…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- State v. Gopher Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Travelers Insurance Company v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. SheetsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Getter v. R. G. Dickinson & Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1973
- Patterson v. Wu Family Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Collins v. Miller & Miller, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.