Legal Opinion

Vogel v. Chase Securities Corp.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 19, 1936No. 671PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNordbye, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The motion to quash herein presents, in part, questions which were before the Supreme Court of Minnesota in Streissguth v. Chase Securities Corporation, 268 N.W. 638, decided on July 24, 1936. In so far as that case is applicable, the court approves the conclusions reached. However, other grounds in support of the motion are urged: (1) That the service of the summons and complaint upon the Deputy Commissioner did not confer jurisdiction; and (2) that the service cannot be sustained because the transaction giving rise to the cause of action is not covered by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vercellini v. U. S. I. Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Webster v. U. S. I. Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. First National Bank v. Consolidated School District No. 28Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Olesen v. RetzlaffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Burzinski v. Kinyon Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adams v. Little Missouri Minerals AssociationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Stern v. National City Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1938
  4. Shepard v. City Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1938
  5. Adams v. Little Missouri Minerals AssociationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API