Legal Opinion

Chubbuck v. Cleveland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1887PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of Stillwater.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

The parties are residents of Wisconsin, and the defendant is the owner of a team alleged to be exempt under the laws of that state. This action was commenced by attachment issued out of the municipal court of the city of Stillwater, and levied on the team while temporarily in that city. The defendant answered by attorney, and at the trial the court ordered judgment for plaintiff upon the pleadings, and the defendant appeals from the judgment. It is alleged in the answer, in substance, that the plaintiff caused the attachment to be issued through the agency of one Kelly, acting for him, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheelock v. . LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Townsend v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Iasigi v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  4. Higgins v. BeveridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  5. Gilbert v. Vanderpool & BeekmanNew York Supreme Court · 1818

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wichita Falls Compress v. W. L. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Hoyt v. ClanceyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. Copas v. Anglo-American Provision Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Whittier v. Village of FarmingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Moletor v. SinnenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API