Chubbuck v. Cleveland
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of Stillwater.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The parties are residents of Wisconsin, and the defendant is the owner of a team alleged to be exempt under the laws of that state. This action was commenced by attachment issued out of the municipal court of the city of Stillwater, and levied on the team while temporarily in that city. The defendant answered by attorney, and at the trial the court ordered judgment for plaintiff upon the pleadings, and the defendant appeals from the judgment. It is alleged in the answer, in substance, that the plaintiff caused the attachment to be issued through the agency of one Kelly, acting for him, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wheelock v. . LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Townsend v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Iasigi v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Higgins v. BeveridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Gilbert v. Vanderpool & BeekmanNew York Supreme Court · 1818
3Cited by25 opinions
- Wichita Falls Compress v. W. L. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Hoyt v. ClanceyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Copas v. Anglo-American Provision Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Whittier v. Village of FarmingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Moletor v. SinnenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.