Legal Opinion
Stubblefield v. Gruenberg
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 26, 1988No. C1-88-123PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Appellant Michael L. Gruenberg defaulted on a note in favor of respondent William D. Stubblefield. Stubblefield initiated an action for the amount due on the note. Gruenberg answered the complaint and, as an affirmative defense, alleged fraud in the inducement. Stubblefield moved for summary judgment.
Stubblefield obtained summary judgment. The trial court found Gruenberg’s allegations of fraud were not pleaded with particularity. Therefore, the trial court held Gruenberg had set forth no facts sufficient to defeat Stubblefield’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
FACTS
T…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Rice v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Vandeputte v. SoderholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schumacher v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Berke v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Schluter v. United Farmers ElevatorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Midwest Bank v. David H. Goldsmith, IncDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Robert Allen Taylor Company v. United Credit Recovery, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, US Bancorp, a Delaware corporation d/b/a U. S. Bank National Association, Leonard G. PotilloCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.