Legal Opinion
Schluter v. United Farmers Elevator
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 24, 1991No. C1-91-1279PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
Robert, David, and Hazel Schluter (farmers) seek payment from United Farmers Elevator (elevator) for grain delivered to the elevator via an independent trucker. On appeal from an entry of summary judgment for the elevator, the farmers argue: (1) there are genuine issues of material fact; and (2) the trial court abused its discretion by denying their motion to stay entry of judgment so as to permit further discovery. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
Robert, David, and Hazel Schluter are grain farmers in Starbuck, Minnesota. The elevator is a public grain elevator in Mur-dock,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Eldon's Super Fresh Stores, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Wohlrabe v. PownellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lakes Gas Co. v. Clark Oil Trading Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Schluter v. United Farmers ElevatorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991