Legal Opinion

CROWNOVER v. KEEL

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 26, 2015No. 112,728PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMBS, V.C.J.;

T1 The question presented on appeal is whether an owner of real property received constitutionally sufficient notice of the sale of his property for delinquent taxes when notice was provided only by publication and certified mail that was returned undelivered. We hold that he did not.

L

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

12 At issue in this cause is the ownership of certain real property in Melntosh County, Oklahoma. - Plaintiff/Appellant Vernon L. Crownover (Crownover) originally obtained title to this property by virtue of warranty deed recorded in the Melntosh County Clerk's Office on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. LEE v. BUENOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. MAXWELL v. SPRINT PCSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. BROWN v. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT RESOURCES INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  4. DANI v. MILLERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  5. Graham v. D & K Oilfield Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API