Legal Opinion
MAXWELL v. SPRINT PCS
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 12, 2016No. 113,898, 113,811, 113,941, 114,161PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGurich, J.
Facts & Procedural Htstory
[ 1 On February 2, 2014, Petitioner Theresa Maxwell suffered an injury to her knee while working for her Employer, Respondent Sprint PCS. She promptly notified her Employer and timely filed a CC-Form-8 with the Workers' Compensation Commission on March 18, 2014, The Employer admitted Petitioner's injury to her knee was compen-sable, and she had surgery to repair a tendon in her knee. Petitioner also received temporary total disability benefits from February 6, 2014, until February 24, 2014. After reaching maximum medical improvement on July 2, 2014, she returned to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Glasco v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Special Indemnity Fund v. FigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Protective Health Services State Department of Health v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- HILL v. AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Gibby v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- VASQUEZ v. DILLARD'S, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- BRAITSCH v. CITY OF TULSASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.