Legal Opinion

Graham v. D & K Oilfield Services, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 19, 2017No. 115,898PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMBS, C.J.:

¶ 1 The question presented to this Court is whether 86A O.S. Supp, 2013. § 61 is unconstitutional because: 1) it violates the due process rights of claimants guaranteed by U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1 and Okla. Const, art. 2, § 7; 2) it is a special law prohibited by Okla. Const, art. 6,46; and 3) it fails to provide an adequate remedy for a recognized wrong, in violation of Okla. Const, art. 2, § 6. We answer in the negative, However, in light of this Court’s, opinion ih Corbeil v. Emricks Van & Storage, 2017 OK 71, 404 P.3d 856, this cause is remanded for further proceedings…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Adams v. Iten Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  5. LEE v. BUENOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. SOUTHON v. OKLAHOMA TIRE RECYCLERS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  2. WELLS v. OKLAHOMA ROOFING & SHEET METALSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  3. SOUTHON v. OKLAHOMA TIRE RECYCLERS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  4. BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  5. The Institute For Responsible Alcohol Policy v. State ex rel. Alcohol Beverage Laws Enforcement Comm.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API