Graham v. D & K Oilfield Services, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
COMBS, C.J.:
¶ 1 The question presented to this Court is whether 86A O.S. Supp, 2013. § 61 is unconstitutional because: 1) it violates the due process rights of claimants guaranteed by U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1 and Okla. Const, art. 2, § 7; 2) it is a special law prohibited by Okla. Const, art. 6,46; and 3) it fails to provide an adequate remedy for a recognized wrong, in violation of Okla. Const, art. 2, § 6. We answer in the negative, However, in light of this Court’s, opinion ih Corbeil v. Emricks Van & Storage, 2017 OK 71, 404 P.3d 856, this cause is remanded for further proceedings…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Adams v. Iten Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- LEE v. BUENOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- SOUTHON v. OKLAHOMA TIRE RECYCLERS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- WELLS v. OKLAHOMA ROOFING & SHEET METALSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- SOUTHON v. OKLAHOMA TIRE RECYCLERS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- The Institute For Responsible Alcohol Policy v. State ex rel. Alcohol Beverage Laws Enforcement Comm.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.