Legal Opinion
LEE v. BUENO
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 20, 2016No. 114,563PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COMBS, V.C.J.:
¶ 1 The primary question before this Court is the constitutionality of 12 O.S. 2011 § 3009.1, a section of the OHahoma Evidence Code limiting the admissibility of evidence of medical costs in personal injury actions. Plaintifi/Petitioner' asserts, broadly, that 12 O.S. 2011 § 3009.1: 1) is an unconstitutional special law prohibited by OHa. Const, art. 5, § 46; 2) denies personal injury plaintiffs access to the courts and their right to a trial by jury under OHa. Const, art. 2, §§ 6 & 19; 3) violates the due process rights of personal injury plaintiffs; 4) violates the separation…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Moorhead v. Crozer Chester Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Barrios v. Haskell Cnty. Pub. Facilities Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- BROWN v. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT RESOURCES INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- HILL v. AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- BRAITSCH v. CITY OF TULSASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.