DANI v. MILLER
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
COMBS, V.C.J.:
1 The question presented to this Court is whether the trial court properly granted Defendants/Appellees' motion to dismiss the action for failure to state claims upon which relief may be granted, and denied Plaintiff/Appellant's motion for summary judgment. We hold in the affirmative, and affirm the trial court's order.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
12 Plaintiff /Appellant Robert N. Dani (Appellant) is an Oklahoma resident and taxpayer. Certain property belonging to Appellant was handed over to the State Treasurer pursuant to the Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (UUPA), 60 0.8. §§…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- CATES v. INTEGRIS HEALTH, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- GRISHAM v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- KRIMBILL v. TALARICOCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Draxxion Talandar v. Elizabeth Manchester-MurphySupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.