Legal Opinion
Dusenbery v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 8, 2002No. 00-6567PublishedCited by 864 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
This case concerns the adequacy of the means employed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to provide notice to a federal prisoner of his right to contest the administrative forfeiture of property seized during the execution of a search warrant for the residence where he was arrested.
In April 1986, officers of the FBI arrested petitioner Larry Dean Dusenbery at a house trailer in Atwater, Ohio. Later that day, they obtained and executed a search warrant, seizing drugs, drug paraphernalia, several firearms, a ballistic knife, an automobile registered in the name of petitioner's…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by864 opinions
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- In the Interest of E.R.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
- Grayden v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Miner v. Clinton County, NYCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Nelson v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
859 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.