State v. Critt
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for first-degree arson. Minn.Stat. § 609.561, subd. 3 (1994). Appellant Justin Critt challenges the admissibility of his statement to police. Because we find that there was no substantial violation of the Scales recording requirement and that appellant’s confession was voluntary, we affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Justin Critt and his accomplice, Donald Kramer, were charged with first-degree arson in connection with a fire on November 6, 1994, at the Detroit Lakes Junior High School. Critt was 17 years old at the time of the fire, but…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. ScalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. HardimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. ThaggardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re the Welfare of M.E.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. BarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BerriosCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. InmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re the Welfare of D.B.X.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.