Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of D.B.X.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 8, 2002No. C4-01-792PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

D.B.X. was adjudicated delinquent for theft of a motor vehicle after he confessed to the crime during a police interrogation. He argues that he did not voluntarily waive his Miranda rights following the warning police gave him during his interrogation and that his later confession was not voluntary because he was subjected to a variety of coercive and improper police threats and promises. The district court concluded that the Miranda warning and waiver were adequate and that the confession was voluntary. We reverse.

FACTS

In the early morning hours of September 28, 1999,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. PilcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. State v. SlowinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. RittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of T.J.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. State of Minnesota v. Jason DeWayne KirkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API