Legal Opinion
State v. Berrios
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 24, 2010No. A09-1675PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
Appellant challenges his conviction of third-degree criminal sexual conduct, arguing that the district court abused its discretion by removing a seated juror after the juror requested foreign-language interpretive services on the second day of trial. Appellant also contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict, and he raises additional issues in a pro se supplemental brief. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Milton Berrios was charged with third-degree criminal sexual conduct, a violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.344, subd. 1(d) (2008) (prohibiting sexual…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- United States v. Gonzalez-SoberalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Nichols v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Nichols v. State, Office of the SecretaryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Daniel PiperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. David Alan WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.