Legal Opinion

State v. Heath

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 10, 2004No. A03-737PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

Appellant challenges his conviction of multiple counts of first-degree controlled-substance violations involving the sale and conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine, making several arguments concerning the propriety and sufficiency of the evidence used to convict him, the possible exculpatory value of evidence destroyed by police after the methamphetamine lab raid, the court’s conduct during trial, and the appropriateness of the sentence appellant received. Because (1) federal and state regulations required the destruction of the allegedly exculpatory…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BarajasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State v. HawkinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. State v. O'MEARACourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  4. State v. EngleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State v. HagerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API