Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 2006No. A05-1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WORKE, Judge.

On appeal from a pretrial order granting a motion to suppress evidence of intoxication and dismiss charges of third-degree DWI, the state argues that the district court clearly erred in ruling that the officer, who saw that the engine compartment of respondent’s motorcycle was illuminated by purple recessed lighting, did not have an objective legal basis to stop respondent because the low-level lighting did not actually violate the statute prohibiting unauthorized colored lighting on vehicles. Because the light configuration on respondent’s motorcycle violated Minn.Stat. §…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schumacher v. HalversonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
  2. In Re Appeal of StaleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  3. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  4. Hoekstra v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  5. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API