State v. Inman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
Daniel Inman seeks review of an unpublished court of appeals decision affirming his convictions of first-degree manufacture and fifth-degree possession of methamphetamine. Inman argues that the interrogating officer’s failure to record his custodial interrogation constituted a substantial violation of Scales such that the statement should have been suppressed. We affirm the court of appeals.
In the late afternoon of April 19, 2001, police officers entered the home of Paul and Kelly Becksted and executed a search warrant. The warrant was based on information received from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. ScalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. PilcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MantheySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. Castillo-AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. Castillo-AlvarezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.