In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lewelling
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary proceeding the accused is charged with violation of DR 6-101(A)(3) (neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him) and DR 7-101(A)(2) (intentionally failing to carry out a contract of employment) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.
We find that in February, 1982, the accused undertook to represent Daniel Ropp in the defense of a civil claim against Mr. Ropp for money allegedly due and owing under an automobile lease agreement. The accused successfully filed a motion for change of venue from Multnomah to Lincoln County and subsequently filed an answer on behalf of Mr.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LoewOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LewellingOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of VarnesOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HerefordOregon Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1992