Legal Opinion

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lewelling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1984No. OSB 83-68; SC S31075PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary proceeding the accused is charged with violation of DR 6-101(A)(3) (neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him) and DR 7-101(A)(2) (intentionally failing to carry out a contract of employment) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

We find that in February, 1982, the accused undertook to represent Daniel Ropp in the defense of a civil claim against Mr. Ropp for money allegedly due and owing under an automobile lease agreement. The accused successfully filed a motion for change of venue from Multnomah to Lincoln County and subsequently filed an answer on behalf of Mr.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LoewOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LewellingOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of VarnesOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HerefordOregon Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API