Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 2005No. 485PA04PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

The primary question presented for review is whether sentencing errors which violate a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to jury trial pursuant to the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004), may be deemed harmless. We conclude that Blakely errors are structural and modify and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals remanding defendant’s case to Gaston County Superior Court for resentencing.

Preliminarily, this Court must also examine the effect of Blakely on criminal sentencing in North Carolina. We…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  3. State v. HantonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. State v. ForteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. HurtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API