Moore v. W O O W, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPaRkeh, J.
Defendant has filed with his brief a demurrer '-in the Supreme Court in which it avers that the complaint fails’-testate a cause of action, in that “the complaint' fails to allege- that1 Walter Stiles was the agent, real or apparent, of the defendant cor~; poration, or that he was acting within the course and scope of his authority.” ‘ "
The allegations in the complaint in respect to the sufficiency^ of the complaint as challenged by the demurrer are in substance-: In February 1958 Walter Stiles, vice president, a promoter, and an in-corporator of defendant corporation, discussed with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Whichard v. LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Whichard v. . LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Bank v. Hay.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Aiken v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Hayman v. Ramada Inn, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Sale v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Daniel Boone Complex, Inc. v. FurstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.