Daniel Boone Complex, Inc. v. Furst
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
The threshold issue essential to determination of the questions raised by appellants is what were the respective rights of the parties at the beginning of the loan transactions?
Daniel Boone Complex, Inc. executed a purchase money deed of trust to the Freelands in the amount of $1,085,000 to secure the purchase price of the complex. This deed of trust had priority over the amount of money secured by the Furst-Camilco loan. Camilco asserts that since it furnished the consideration, the $136,550.73 used for settlement costs, it was the owner of the equity of redemption ab initio.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Shope v. BoyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Lane v. CoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Mezzanotte v. FreelandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kloian v. Domino's Pizza, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Food Lion, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
- Giammanco v. GiammancoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Hayman v. Ramada Inn, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.