Legal Opinion

Whichard v. Lipe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1942PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarNhill, J.

Plaintiff elected to allege that defendant Tilley (who was not served with summons) was operating defendant’s truck at the time it allegedly collided with the truck occupied by plaintiff’s intestate. Expressio facii cessare taciturn. There is no evidence tending to support this allegation. Plaintiff so understood and during the trial took the position that some agent of defendant was driving but declined to say which one. The court likewise so understood and more than once charged the jury “there is no evidence in this case as to who was operating the truck known as the Lipe truck.” Non…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. State v. . HarbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. McKee, Sheriff v. . LinebergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  5. Talley v. Harriss Granite Quarries Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Floyd v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Ingold v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Moore v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. GENERAL AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY v. DouglassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API