Osment v. Mcelrath
California Supreme Court
- .Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
— In July, 1869, the plaintiff and defendant entered into partnership as attorneys and counsel*467lors at law, and took an office in the city of San Francisco. The partnership was continued until the 7th of November, 1874, and then dissolved by mutual consent. At the time of its dissolution all moneys on hand, and all other assets and property of the firm, were equally divided between the partners. There were some fees due, but uncollected, for business which had been finished, and they had several cases in the courts, in some of which the fees were, and in others were not,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Denver v. RoaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Carey v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Ashley v. VischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Farrell v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Wheelock v. Pacific Pneumatic Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by26 opinions
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Thompson v. StuckeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.