Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Thomas v. Siemens AG
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 13, 2014No. Civil Action No. 09-4414PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SAVAGE, District Judge.
In this qui tarn action brought under the *544False Claims Act (“FCA”)1 in which the government has declined to intervene, the defendant Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. (“SMS”) has moved for summary judgment, arguing that the relator, William Thomas (“Thomas”), cannot prevail on his claims because there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact regarding whether SMS made any knowingly false statements or omissions in obtaining the contracts at issue, or that the statements or omissions were material or induced the government to enter into the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- D'Agostino v. EV3, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Second Chance Body Armor Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States v. Triad Isotopes, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- United States ex rel. Dickson v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (In re Plavix Mktg., Sales Practice & Prods. Liab. Litig. (NO. II))District Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- United States Ex Rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.