Legal Opinion
United States v. Triad Isotopes, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 15, 2015No. Case No.: 11-cv-8098PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge
Before the Court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss [94, 96, 99, 102, 103] Relator’s and Plaintiffs amended complaint [88]. Defendants’ motions are denied as to Counts I-IV and granted as to Counts V-VII. Counts V-VII of the amended complaint are dismissed without prejudice. Relator and Plaintiff should inform the court within 14 days as to whether they intend to file a second amended complaint repleading Counts V-VII, at which time the Court will set a status hearing to discuss scheduling moving forward.
I. Background1
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Authenticom, Inc. v. CDK Global, LLC (In re Dealer Mgmt. Sys. Antitrust Litig.)District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- United States ex rel. Lisitza v. Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- 3 R Health Care Products v. Cardinal Health 110Appellate Court of Illinois · 2026
- 3DGS, LLC v. Chai Trust Company, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- April Manuel v. B H G Holdings L L C ET ALDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2026
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.