Legal Opinion
United States v. Second Chance Body Armor Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 4, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2007-1144PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge
The government brought these actions against defendants Second Chance Body Armor, Inc. and related entities (collectively “Second Chance”), Toyobo Co., Ltd. and Toyobo America, Inc. (collectively “Toyo-bo”), and individual defendants Thomas Bachner, Jr., Richard Davis, Karen McCraney, and Larry McCraney alleging violations of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, and common law claims, in connection with allegedly defective body armor material made or sold by the defendants involving federally-funded purchases.
Toyobo…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. BornsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- D'Agostino v. EV3, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Dyncorp International, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States Ex Rel. Landis v. Tailwind Sports Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States Ex Rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.