Legal Opinion

State v. Edwards

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1968No. 821PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

Defendant contends that the court erred in admitting his alleged confession without first conducting a voir dire examination.

In the case of State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69, 150 S.E. 2d 1, it is stated:

“When the State proposes to offer in evidence the defend ant’s confession or admission, and the defendant objects, the proper procedure is for the trial judge to excuse the jury and, in its absence, hear the evidence, both that of the State and that of the defendant, upon the question of the voluntariness of the statement. In the light of such evidence and of his observation of the demeanor of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. VickersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. FuquaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. . HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API