State v. Vickers
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
Defendant’s statements made to police' officers while in custody were inculpatory since they placed him at the scene of the crime and placed in his possession the weapon described by the State’s; chief witness as having been used in the perpetration of the robbery. Upon the defendant’s objection to the. introduction of the statements, the trial judge simply overruled the objection and did not hold a voir dire hearing to determine the voluntariness of defendant’s statements.
The case of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, is not applicable to the instant case since trial of this case had begun…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.