Legal Opinion
State v. Barrow
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided March 11, 1970No. 3PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
172 S.E.2d 512 (1970)
276 N.C. 381
STATE of North Carolina
v.
William Norman BARROW.
No. 3.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
March 11, 1970.
Weinstein, Waggoner, Sturges & Odom, by T. LaFontine Odom and Wallace C. Tyser, Jr., Charlotte, for defendant appellant.
Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., by James F. Bullock, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Christine Y. Denson, Raleigh, Staff Atty., for the State.
HUSKINS, Justice.
At the commencement of the trial defendant moved to sequester the State's witnesses and assigns as error the denial of his motion.
It is the general rule in North Carolina, in both civil and criminal…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. TatumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. McKennaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.